新着順:23/2620 記事一覧表示 | 《前のページ | 次のページ》

ハランの花粉媒介はキノコバエ

 投稿者:  投稿日:2018年 3月 1日(木)23時12分32秒 KD182250243012.au-net.ne.jp
  通報
  末次 健司
https://www.facebook.com/kenji.suetsugu.5/posts/965997966890900?pnref=story
紫色で多肉質の変わった姿をした花を地面にめり込んで咲かせることから「世界で最も変わった花」の一つと言われていた「ハラン」の花粉の運び手を明らかにした論文をEcology誌に発表しました.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2021

世界で最も変わった花というと何を思い浮かべるでしょうか?1m以上の花をつけるラフレシアやショクダイオオコンニャクを思い浮かべる人も多いかもしれません.しかし実は,「世界で最も変わった花」といわれている植物が日本に分布しています.

それはハランという植物です.ハラン(葉蘭)は,名前に「蘭」とつきますが,キジカクシ科という科に属する植物です. 寿司などの食品に付属する緑色のプラスチック装飾品“バラン”は、ハランを真似て作られた物です。

ランは、紫色で多肉質の変わった姿の花を、ちょうど地面にめり込んだような格好で咲かせますが,花粉の運び手は、「ナメクジ」や「ヨコエビ」などの土壌動物であるという報告がなされてきました。

他にこれらを運び手とする花がほとんどないことから、ハランは「世界で最も変わった花」と呼ばれており,数少ない土壌動物媒花として送粉生態学の教科書にも取り上げられていました。しかしこれまでの報告には、自生地での観察ではない,もしくは,直接観察した訳ではないなどの欠点もありました.

そこで,今回私たちは,ハランの花に訪れる動物を,自生地である黒島において,観察を行いました.その結果,ナメクジは全く訪れないことやヨコエビが花に訪れる回数は極めて少ないことを突き止めました.一方、有効な花粉の運び手として浮かび上がってきたのはキノコバエでした.

今回花に訪れていたキノコバエ類は,いずれも幼虫がキノコを食べることが明らかになっている種です.つまり,ハランの奇妙な花姿は,キノコに擬態することでキノコバエ類を騙して,花粉を運ばせようとするしたたかな戦略であることが示唆されました.

キノコバエ類に受粉を託す植物は珍しい存在ですが,ほかにも知られています.今回の研究は,これまで教科書で紹介されるほど長く信じられていた風変りな仮説を直接観察によって覆し,ハランが,翅を持たない土壌動物ではなく,他の植物と同じように飛ぶ昆虫によって花粉が運ばれていることを明らかにしました.「世界で最も変わった花」は,そこまで風変わりではなかったといえるかもしれません.

Subterranean flowers of Aspidistra elatior are mainly pollinated by not terrestrial amphipods but fungus gnats
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.2021/full

The genus Aspidistra (Asparagaceae) comprises over 130 species of herbaceous plants (Chase et al. 2009), most of which are distributed in Southeast Asia (Vislobokov et al. 2013). However, even though most Aspidistra species are common, they are also inconspicuous, and the leaf litter of forest habitats usually covers their flowers and fruits, both of which are found close to ground level (Fig. 1A). Therefore, the Aspidistra flower is often considered cryptic (Phonsena and De Wilde 2010). Nevertheless, the flowers are extraordinarily diverse, and their morphology is considered critical to species delimitation (Vislobokov et al. 2013, Tillich 2008).

Figure 1.
(A) Aspidistra elatior flower in forest litter. (B) Longitudinal section of A. elatior flower. (C) The fungus gnat Cordyla sixi (Mycetophilidae) exiting gaps between the stigma lobes and the perianth tube and carrying a lot of A. elatior pollen grains. (D) Diaprid wasp exiting a gap between the stigma lobes and the perianth tube and carrying a few A. elatior pollen grains.

The pollination of biology of Aspidistra is interesting because of the extreme diversity in its floral morphology, its inconspicuous appearance, and the forest litter which covers them (Vislobokov et al. 2013). Because of these reasons, little is known about the pollinators of almost all the species. Nevertheless, the unusual flowers suggest biotic pollination, since pollen grains are hidden under each flower's stigma and because the flowers look like insect traps (Vislobokov et al. 2013). The stamens of A. elatior positioned within a perianth chamber under a large stigma (Fig. 1B) that has a receptive upper surface, thereby rendering self-pollination impossible (Buchenau 1867). One researcher, Delpino (1868) provided compelling evidence for cross-pollination in cultivated A. elatior; he located Aspidistra pollen grains along the trajectories of floral visitors exiting a small opening formed between the stigmatic margin and the perianth tube. In addition, Wilson (1889) suggested that A. elatior was pollinated by slugs, a hypothesis subsequently adopted by numerous studies as a rare example of angiosperm flowers being pollinated by mollusks (e.g., Richards 1986).

More recently, Kato (1995) conducted the first investigation of A. elatior visitors in the species’ native habitat and failed to find any evidence of pollination by slugs. Instead, the author observed Platorchestia japonica (Amphipoda) feeding on pollen, which suggested that A. elatior could be pollinated by the terrestrial crustaceans (Kato 1995). Pollination by crustaceans and collembolans has also been suspected in the introduced population of A. elatior (Conran and Bradbury 2007). Taken together, Vislobokov et al. (2013) noted that the information known about the floral ecology of A. elatior suggests it has the most unusual pollination ecology among all angiosperms. However, the novel observations by Kato (1995) and Conran and Bradbury (2007) relied on collected flowers that were studied through dissection. Therefore, without direct observations in the field, the study could have underestimated the role of more quickly moving visitor groups.

In order to further elucidate the pollination biology of A. elatior, we conducted the first direct observation of A. elatior visitors in the species’ natural habitat. Aspidistra elatior is widely cultivated in both China and Japan but is indigenous to only a few small islands in the southern part of Japan (Liang and Tamura 2000). Therefore, we made direct observations of pollinators visiting A. elatior flowers in evergreen oak forests at altitudes between ca. 300?600 m on Kuroshima Island, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan, where A. elatior is abundant in the understory. We performed the observations of floral visitors for ca. 30 h in mid- to late April of 2015?2016, covering all periods of a 24 h cycle, and red light was used during nocturnal observations to minimize the effect of light on the visitors. We also tagged 253 flowers in mid-April 2016 and assessed the fruit sets under natural condition in late October 2016.

We observed that five individuals of fungus gnats visited and penetrated thorough the gaps between the stigma lobes and perianth tube, three of which were captured for the precise identification. They were identified as Cordyla sixi (Mycetophilidae), newly recorded from Japan, and Bradysia sp. (Sciaridae; Table 1). In addition, all captured fungus gnats were male, thereby providing no evidence that the flowers serve as brood sites. When a fungus gnat visited a flower, it landed on the upper surface of the stigma so that, if the fungus gnat had previously visited another flower, cross-pollination would occur. The fungus gnats often penetrated under the stigma by entering small openings between the stigma lobes and perianth tube. Therefore, when the fungus gnats exited, they were covered with pollen grains (Fig. 1C). The fungus gnats would often try to penetrate under the stigma several times before succeeding and, then, would remain there for up to dozens of seconds, before exiting through the gaps. Because flowers of Aspidistra do not produce nectar and adult fungus gnats do not feed on pollen grains, we concluded that fungus gnats did not receive any benefits from this interaction.

Table 1. Composition of floral visitors to Aspidistra elatior

Interestingly, a wasp in the family Diapriidae was also documented as a potential pollinator. We observed only one, but the wasp penetrated under the stigma through the gaps between the stigma lobes and perianth tube, and when the wasp exited, it was covered with pollen grains (Fig. 1D). The diaprid wasps are parasitoids that attack the larvae of fungus gnats (Gauld et al. 1988), and they have also been documented to pollinate Cypripedium fasciculatum, the morphology of which is similar to species pollinated primarily by fungal gnats (Lipow et al. 2002). Therefore, the similar appearance of A. elatior and mushroom fruit bodies may help attract fungus gnats, as well as their natural enemies (Tillich 2005). In fact, larva of both C. sixi and Bradysia sp. are known as the fungivore.

As reported by previous studies (Kato 1995, Conran and Bradbury 2007), we also observed small soil invertebrates, such as Ceratophysella denticulata and Platorchestia japonica, in the A. elatior flowers. Therefore, we cannot exclude the role of soil invertebrates as supplemental pollinators. However, these visitors would play relatively minor roles as pollinators since they are only able to carry a few pollen grains, even after penetrating the stigma. The flowers were also visited by two species of ants (e.g., Pachycondyla nakasujii and Nylanderia flavipes), but the behavior of the ants observed in the field was much less focused than that of the fungus gnats. Instead, the ants primarily appeared to walk around the perianth lobe and stigma, and the ants were rarely observed penetrated under the stigma using the gaps used by the fungus gnats.

We predicted that the fungus gnats are the most effective pollinator of A. elatior since (1) they were observed on multiple occasions departing from Aspidistra flowers with a lot of pollen grains on their bodies, (2) they were the dominant flying insects that visited the Aspidistra flowers, and (3) the flowers that they visited often developed fruits (2 fruits/5 flowers) despite the population's overall low fruit set (12 fruits/253 flowers). Since experienced insects usually avoid non-rewarding plants due their associative learning ability, the deceptive pollinator attraction strategy could account for the low pollination visitation rate (Tremblay et al. 2004), and this could contribute to the low reproductive success of these plants. In addition, the size of the fungus gnats allows them to pass through the gaps between the stigma lobes and perianth, enter the chamber, and locate the stamens. Therefore, we speculate that the methodology used by Kato (1995) may have been insufficient for detecting dipteran visitors, likely owing to their short duration of their visitations.

Indeed, several aspects of A. elatior's floral morphology, such as its superficial similarity to mushroom fruit bodies, suggest that Aspidistra species are pollinated by fungus gnats (Tillich 2005). We also found that the A. elatior in our study site emitted a strong musty odor, while other Aspidistra flowers are often described as odorless. Therefore, the fungus gnats may be attracted by both visual and chemical mimicry. It is also interesting to note that Cordyla species, that are the main pollinators of A. elatior, also pollinate Heterotropa which is also considered a mushroom mimic (Sugawara 1988).

Vislobokov et al. (2013, 2014) also observed that flies pollinate some species of the genus Aspidistra. Therefore, in combination with the results of the present study, we suspected that dipteran pollination would be common among Aspidistra species. However, pollination biology of each Aspidistra species will still be very diverse. For example, the pollinators of the two other species observed so far belong to different dipteran families; A. phanluongii is pollinated by flies of genus Megaselia (Phoridae) (Vislobokov et al. 2013), whereas A. xuansonensis is pollinated by gall midges, whose larvae are able to grow in the pollen mass (Vislobokov et al. 2014). Further study is needed to elucidate the diversity of unique pollination systems in Aspidistra.
Acknowledgments

We thank Drs Taizo Nakamori, Kyohei Watanabe and Shigeko Fukumoto for their assistance with insect identification. This work was financially supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number 17H05016).
 
》記事一覧表示

新着順:23/2620 《前のページ | 次のページ》
/2620